Translation of "War guilt" in German

Even during the Great War Heinrich Kanner started his research for the question of the war guilt.

The victors decreed Germany's war guilt.

Kalavryta stands for war crimes, resistance, guilt and reparation.

After the war, European guilt was quicklytranslated into Zionist power.

One hundred years after the beginning of the war a new debate over the war guilt has flared up.

What is your position in the debate about the war guilt - and does such talk achieve anything?

Although there have been numerous initiatives to investigate its war guilt, especially its occupation of China, there has not yet been an official effort comparable to what the Germans undertook to take collective responsibility for their war crimes.

An open Japan would, by definition, be more outward-looking, would speak better English so that it could communicate across Asia and the world, would be more influenced by foreign ideas - including ideas concerning war guilt.

After the end of World War I the "Aircraft of Nuremberg" became part of the acrimonious war guilt debate.

They view the North and South Korean-Japanese relationship as no longer particularly special, but rather desire to rebuild it as a "normal relationship"—one in which Japanese war guilt is no longer a factor in bilateral negotiations.

He opposed U.S. participation in the war and in 1922 published Shall It Be Again?, a book criticizing the war and America's involvement which was cited by, among others, former German Kaiser Wilhelm II in his memoirs on the question of war guilt.

As for myself, I then saw clearly that for the small group which first composed our movement the question of war guilt had to be cleared up, and cleared up in the light of historical truth.

A “war guilt” clause (Article 231) implicitly blamed the Central Powers (especially Germany) for starting the war.

Veale's statement of 1963, when he noted that the solution of the question of war guilt, which is of unique importance for the future, is neither a mere academic problem nor a question of finding the truth, and hence cannot be left up to historiography for resolution.

However, the Holocaust subject is avoided only on first impression, because according to the above quoted Eschenburg thesis, one leg of the post-war order would disappear under the question of war guilt, reduced here to the deciding factor of the German-Soviet relationship, and how could this post-war order be maintained if it is only supported by a concept of the Holocaust enforced by governmental repression?

Ten days later, newsweekly Der Spiegel published an article by Dirk Kurbjuweit titled "World War I Guilt: Culpability Question Divides Historians", posing the question of "German guilt" in the First and Second World Wars.

Obviously, the victor in any war is not the best judge of the war crime guilt.