Translation of "Für die beantwortung der frage" in English

Now we need to answer the question of whether your should.

Mr President, I should like to thank the President-in-Office for his response.

Crucial to answering the question, whether the rental costs are reasonable, are three factors:

The time limit of answering the question will be displayed by the bar above the figure.

I would like to thank the Commissioner for answering the question and I would like to say that we are of course looking forward to receiving more specific proposals regarding which initiatives are to be put into practice, and I am delighted that this is taking place before the summer recess, because I think it is important to follow up on this matter right now while we are discussing the euro.

Thank you for answering the question, but, colleagues, I will read you the Rule because we must know about it.

First I would like to thank the Commissioner for a very satisfactory answer and generally to say thank you for the Commissioner's work in connection with state aid.

Does the Commission think it will be able to develop sufficient influence on and cooperation with these countries with its proposal, so that the same reform processes take place there as in the present candidate countries and in time a kind of equality will develop that opens the way to answering the question as to whether these countries can also become members of the Union?

Thank you, Commissioner, and thank you for dealing with that last question.

This would constitute a ‘litmus test’ for assessment of the results of these Presidential elections and for determination of whether to support Kazakhstan in its drive to take on the Chairmanship of the OSCE.

After further consideration of the timelines proposed for the submission of the final study report and taking into account that the protocol is due to be submitted by 15 June 2017, the CHMP was of the opinion that the date for the submission of the final study report should be postponed to Q2 2021 in order to allow sufficient time for agreement on a joint protocol and for collection of sufficient data to adequately respond to the scientific question.

The market power of the parties and the characteristics of the relevant market are key factors to determine whether single branding obligations are caught by Article 81(1) and require therefore an assessment pursuant to Article 81(3).

According to settled case-law, the Commission must first establish whether the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd is an undertaking within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the TFEU.

The starting point for reviewing whether it would be useful to keep Directive 84/539/EEC, adopted on 17 September 1984 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to electro-medical equipment used in veterinary medicine, as part of the “acquis” or not, was the opinions expressed by Member States and industries that, over a number of years, the Directive had not been generally applied in the trade of these devices.

The consultation paper invited comments and evidence from governments and industry on certain key issues relevant to an assessment of whether a block exemption for liner conferences continues to be justified.

The relevant questions when determining whether a proposed measure falls within the competence of the Community therefore relate to the nature and the object of the intended action.

According to established case law [10], the starting point in assessing whether the sale involved state resources must be the market economy investor principle (hereinafter ‘MEIP’).

The answer to the question as to whether there is that likelihood must be based on the public’s perception of the goods covered by the mark of the proprietor on the one hand and the goods covered by the sign used by the third party on the other.

The Advocate General deals with this question essentially in the light of the judgment in Manninen,

The interpretation given by the Court in Verbond van Nederlandse Ondernemingen is not therefore relevant for the purpose of answering the question referred for a preliminary ruling in the present case.

It is for the referring court to determine whether the fact that a worker returns at the end of each working day to the family residence in the Member State concerned is relevant for the purposes of deciding whether such a worker satisfies the requirements for the grant of the child benefit in question in that State pursuant to its legislation.

In the light of the foregoing, the Court takes the view that reference should be made to Plaumann v Commission in order to determine whether a person is individually concerned within the meaning of Article 68 of the basic regulation.

It is for the national court to determine whether the circumstances of the case are relevant for the purposes of deciding whether the worker satisfies the requirements for the grant of such child benefit pursuant to the legislation of the Member State in question.

This means that the re-usability of this waste portion under certain conditions could provide a decisive answer to the question of whether or not such a tank can be economically justifiable.

To answer the question of how much may be mined in the coming week without exceeding the per mitted methane content, however, it is nevertheless important to know the probable daily maximum value too.

It is therefore not immediately obvious to me why the way in which the outward and return flights are booked should affect the answer to the question whether a round trip should be regarded as a single ‘flight’ departing from the airport used at the start of that trip.