Translation of "Prioritätsfrist" in English

Room prices are priority period (2018.05.01-2018.08.30)

The priority period is 12 months from the earliest priority claimed.

What is the term of priority in Chinese Taipei?

After 12 months have passed, the priority period for extending a patent to foreign countries is over.

The priority term is 12 months from the earliest claimed priority.

The Contractors must file a claim, or a fresh claim, with the European Patent Office during the priority period.

The priority period is 12 months from the earliest priority claimed, as stipulated in the Paris Convention.

Yes, the priority period is 12 months from the earliest priority claimed, as stipulated in the Paris Convention.

The priority period is 12 months for patents and utility models, and 6 months for trade mark and designs.

If an applicant for an EU trade mark has displayed goods or services under the mark applied for, at an official or officially recognised international exhibition falling within the terms of the Convention relating to international exhibitions signed at Paris on 22 November 1928 and last revised on 30 November 1972, he may, if he files the application within a period of six months of the date of the first display of the goods or services under the mark applied for, claim a right of priority from that date within the meaning of Article 36.

An exhibition priority granted in a Member State or in a third country does not extend the period of priority laid down in Article 43.

An exhibition priority granted in a Member State or in a third country does not extend the period of priority laid down in Article 29.

E. — (1) Where an industrial design is filed in a country by virtue of a right of priority based on the filing of a utility model, the period of priority shall be the same as that fixed for industrial designs.

So if within 12 months from the prior publication by the inventor a European first filing is made and then the international or Japanese application takes place shortly before the expiration of the 12-month priority period, then the application in Japan is too late and the pre-publication cannot benefit from the grace period.

For those who filed their invention first with the European Patent Office, the research should be sent in due time before the expiry of the twelve-month priority period.

In principle, (with the exception of special terms, like the period to claim a priority, the period for filing an opposition, and the period for lodging an appeal), all terms within proceedings are extendable upon request.

Thus, the loss of status as a "regular national filing" might occur up to one year or more after the end of the priority period of twelve months for a subsequent application (Article 4 C of the Paris Convention).

Each Contracting State, however, reserves the right to prescribe that this declaration should be made within the priority period laid down by that Convention.

The board also examined the circumstances under which the issue of exhaustion might arise (splitting up of the subject-matter of the priority application to avoid non-unity objections; filing of a deficient subsequent application and remedying it by means of a second filing; combination of the originally disclosed subject-matter with further improvements and additional embodiments developed during the priority period) and analysed the interests involved.

Application (55) on the basis of which priority was validly claimed for European application (57a) could not therefore form the basis for a second priority claim within the priority period in respect of a different application concerning the same invention for the same countries of the Union.

The formulations in question had been intentionally chosen by the legislator in order to prevent any cumulation of the priority period and the six-month period.

The Convention is silent on whether it is possible to make several filings in respect of the same invention in one and the same country during the priority period and to claim separate priority for each of these applications.

The board of appeal based its decision on Article 4B of the Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property - the Paris Convention. According to this provision "any subsequent filing" during the priority year "shall not be invalidated" by, inter alia, the publication of the invention as covered by the first filing in the priority interval.

Subsequent applications in other countries which have the same seniority as the first application can be made within the period for claiming the right of priority of six months.

In its Statement of Grounds, the appellant pointed out that the correction sought had been requested within the priority period under the Paris Convention.