Translation of "Zu benachteiligen" in English

Differences must be taken into account without penalising certain business models.

In other words, it is not the Commission's intention to disadvantage farmers.

Nor does it intend to disadvantage insurance products that are sold only on the domestic market.

Surely that is not a fitting reward for a lifetime of service to the Community.

This, then, should not be a reason for putting those other countries at a disadvantage.

The aim is not to disadvantage other technologies.

This made it easy to discriminate and marginalize Jewish citizens.

He offered his help without discriminating.

The count who undergoes the first places him at a disadvantage shooting.

But Germany and France insisted that maizefeeding should not be disadvantaged.

Permit the governor to withhold state funds from any school district where segregation had failed.

Mr Titley, I will reply briefly so as not to inconvenience the other MEPs.

In order not to discriminate against wide Powsurfers in our score, the entire surface of the split is decisive.

However, Estonia and Latvia in particular quickly began to disadvantage their Russian-speaking minority systematically.

The European Commission has spoken out against putting the sharing economy at a disadvantage.

They are accusing the government of discriminating against the English-speaking population in the scope of the country's education system.

If you are on an uneven surface, any angle in the playing surface will put someone at a disadvantage.

I do not believe that the Commission set out to inflict an additional tax or wanted to penalise countries situated to the west and east, in other words, more outlying countries.

We cannot discriminate against those women or the partners of those men who chose to dedicate themselves to this type of work, especially when we all agree that we do need to encourage more women to enter the world of business.

I nevertheless feel that we should give more consideration to three areas: the economic downturn and its severe impact on car manufacturers and users, the need to support industry (manufacturers) rather than disadvantaging it with onerous measures (or even fines), and the need to support business (users) rather than inducing additional costs via questionable political measures.

It seems to me, however, that the haste has been ill-advised because instead of remedying situations of hardship, the measure is likely to compound the imbalance and the discrimination that exists between those countries which already make full use of Community resources and others that suffer from an historical disadvantage linked to the system of producer premiums.

This is likely to penalize high-quality beef products heavily as they would then be confused under a European generic label without explanation.

For the same reasons, we are not prepared, nor do we ask, to penalize European producers of beer or alcohols. The problem is education, dissuasion and non-promotion.

These frontier workers are victimized by that situation, for various Member States, primarily the Netherlands - and we have to put the Netherlands in the dock over this - but various Member States have developed the habit of penalizing socially people from across the border who come to work in their countries.

The second proposal involves the need for very vigorous international action so that the measures allowing responsible fishing are applied to both third country fishermen and to Community fishermen, so that our fishermen are not penalised.

It is clear that the prospects of the supply of white fish in the short and long term are worrying and the Community cannot allow itself to penalise its processing industry and leave third countries to create the added value provided by the industry.

The inevitably unfair competition that will result from this risks penalising entire regions, which have specialised in the production of a quality rosé, tailored to a growing demand.