Übersetzung für "Bürokratiekosten" in Englisch

The parties involved expect the system to cut costs of bureaucracy and work.

You know what is needed - to encourage investment, attract capital and boldly cut bureaucratic expenses.

I hope to achieve a significant reduction in bureaucratic costs for small and medium-sized businesses in particular.

Anyone can say that they are cutting costs by 25% when no one knows how high the bureaucracy costs actually are in Europe.

The Commission has therefore made the appropriate proposals, and the result is as follows - I would just like to give you the figures. The measures that legislators have already adopted - and that are therefore already in force - are cutting the costs of bureaucracy for European businesses by EUR 7 billion a year.

We need to find ways to encourage investment, attract capital and boldly cut bureaucratic expenses.

Basically we have identified the costs of red tape for European enterprises as costs arising from reporting, documentation and information obligations.

We expect that will enable us to put forward so many proposals by the end of 2009 that the cost of red tape for European enterprises will fall by 25% in the year 2012.

The Action Programme for reducing administrative burdens in the European Union is one of the pillars of the better lawmaking programme.

I first mentioned back in the spring of 2006 that I intended to cut European businesses' bureaucracy costs arising from European rules by 25% by 2012 and that it would be necessary, in that regard, for the Commission to put forward proposals to that effect by the end of 2009.

It is an absolutely key element of our policy for small and medium-sized enterprises and on scaling back the costs of bureaucracy for micro-businesses.

The smaller a company is, though, the more burdensome it finds the costs involved in dealing with red tape and the more difficult it is for it to plan and make investments and actually achieve some growth.

The goal of achieving an overall reduction in the administrative burdens on enterprises of 25% by 2012 now seems tangibly close.

I am very much obliged to the Council for supporting the Commission's objective of a 25% reduction in the administrative burdens on European enterprises arising from European legislation by 2012.

Our main concern is that the reduction of bureaucracy be driven forward, particularly through clear quantitative targets being laid down.

Furthermore, the Bureaucracy Reduction and Better Regulation Programme was extended in 2011 to cover not just reporting obligations but also other measurable compliance costs.

Measures have focused in particular on reducing the administrative costs for market entrants and on improving the access of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to funding.

As one of the frontrunners in the area of better regulation, the Netherlands aims to build upon the reduction of 20% in administrative costs imposed on business already achieved with an additional net 25% reduced aimed at by 2011.

The abolition of the 10-month rule is likely to lead to a reduction in administrative burden for farms of around EUR 19 million.

ICT research and development, trust and security issues, and measures to reduce administrative costs for businesses and administrations emerge as new priorities in a number of countries.

Farmers and other economic operators in the agricultural sector should be relieved from red-tape and requirements that are not necessary to reach political objectives and ensure proper management of taxpayers' money.

These measures are expected to significantly reduce the administrative cost of placing construction products on the European market without decreasing the levels of safety for construction works.

In order to reduce the administrative costs for issuers when raising capital, this Regulation should lay down conditions under which the report prepared by independent accountants or auditors accompanying profit forecasts and estimates is not required, notably where independent accountants or auditors are not able to sign the audit report because the complete set of documents constitutive of annual financial statements are not available to them.

These recommendations include the setting of a firm target for administrative?burden savings, the creation of an independent body of experts to review impact assessments on the administrative costs of Commission legislative proposals, concentration of the Commission's work on the most important questions that have to be resolved at EU level and on the needs of small and medium-sized undertakings, and more rapid and better information on European legislation.

The administrative costs for businesses and for public authorities of both short-listed Policy Options would be marginal compared to investment and other costs.