Übersetzung für "Bestimmung des vertrages" in Englisch

The Member States have a duty to these millions of electors to guarantee equal voting conditions.

Similar questions were already raised in the sessions of July and September, that is, questions relating to the motivations underlying this or that provision of the treaty of Amsterdam, and their interpretation.

In reserving itself implementing powers, in considering that this constitutes a specific case - which, however, it has not supported by a detailed statement of grounds - the Council is in my view taking liberties with a fundamental provision of the Treaty establishing the European Community. That is something I find unacceptable.

The Committee recognises that article 10.2 is a transposition of a WIPO treaty provision.

Mr Malosse also mentioned the Lisbon Treaty provisions introducing the innovative mechanism for a citizens' initiative, and asked what role the EESC could play in implementing this new right for citizens.

This Treaty provision makes the existing Article 2(4) of Directive 76/207/EEC redundant.

Under the terms of Article 122/EEC, which lays down that one chapter of the annual report shall deal with social developments within the Community, the European Parliament could invitethe Commission of the EEC to draw up reports on any particular problems concerning social conditions, and use of this option was initiated by the social committees or their members.

The aid cannot be found compatible either under Article 87(2) or (3) or under any other provision of the EC Treaty.

Given the Treaty's explicit provision for the free flow of goods, services and capital, the choices open were to give up either the autonomy of domestic monetary policy or the system of fixed exchange rates.

The primacy of the residence criterion in determining voting rights can be justified in the interests of creating a People's Europe. Clearly this must bring benefits in the first instance to citizens of the Member States because their shared achievements underpin freedom of move ment and establishment.

This protest movement was triggered off by the condition of the Treaty of Versailles concluded at the end of the first World War, to the effect that the former German possessions should not be returned to China, but that they should be retained by Japan.

Itshouldbe notedthatthisrecognition relates only tothat provision of the Treaty as the Commission consults regularly onan informal basis with a large number of playersin civil society.

By thus establishing, in favour of those undertakings, a contiguous series of monopolies territorially limited but together covering the entire territory of a Member State,

In abstracto, this is a question of interpretation of a provision of the Treaty. In the final analysis it is the Court of Justice, and it alone, that can give an authoritative reply to the question in the case in point.

The right to be consulted in accordance with a provision of the Treaty is a prerogative of the Parliament. Adopting an act on a legal basis which does not

By its first question, the national court is asking essentially whether Article 90(1) of the Treaty, read in conjunction with the first paragraph of Article 6, and Articles 85 and 86 thereof, is to be interpreted as meaning that it confers on individuals the right to oppose legislation of a Member State which requires them to have recourse, for the performance of dock work, exclusively to recognised dockers such as those referred to in the 1972 Law, and to pay those dockers remuneration far in excess of the wages of their own employees or the wages they pay to other workers.

It added, however: 'This does not mean that this Court can be deprived of jurisdiction to verify, by examining the constitutionality of the law ratifying the Treaty, whether this or that provision of the Treaty, as it is interpreted and applied by the Community institutions and agencies, is not contrary to the fundamental principles of our constitutional system or does not infringe inalienable human rights.'

Nor, finally, do the documents reproduced in the Decision show that the applicant sought to obtain any form of agreement from the wholesalers concerning the implementation of its policy designed to reduce parallel imports.

Severability clause Should one provision of the contract be ineffective, the implementation of the other provisions remains unaffected.

The Vendor shall be entitled to give premature notice of termination a) if the Customer is in default of payment for a period of more than four weeks, or b) the Customer is in breach of a material provision of the contract and, notwithstanding a due written request, such breach of contract recurs, or c) if composition or insolvency proceedings are instituted by a court of law in relation to the Customer's assets or a petition to institute the same is dismissed on the grounds of insufficient assets.