Übersetzung für "Ermessensausübung" in Englisch

Moreover, the arguments provided by the examining division for the exercise of its discretion were not persuasive.

Both sets of constraints reveal possible trade-offs, which ultimately require political judgement.

The showing of consideration towards parties before the EPO should not be confused with the proper exercise of discretion according to law.

This exercise of discretion was not inconsistent with the criteria set out in T 1002/92.

Moreover, it turns out that many likely appropriate applications of blockchain in finance – such as in securitization or supply-chain monitoring – will require intermediaries after all, because there will inevitably be circumstances where unforeseen contingencies arise, demanding the exercise of discretion.

Competent authorities should be in charge of specific tasks entailing appropriate administrative discretion, namely the duty to assess the significance of the damage and to determine which remedial measures should be taken.

Judging solely by the text of the renegotiation clause, the concrete application of the provision appears to largely depend on the discretion of the Norwegian authorities as well as the negotiation skills of the concerned parties.

Human judgements shall take into account all relevant information not considered by the model.

The proceedings initiated by the Commission will enable it to determine whether the selectivity of the measures is justified and whether the schemes confer an advantage within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, in particular as a result of discretionary practices by the tax authorities.

The institution shall document how human judgement and model results are to be combined.

The amendments aim to improve the effectiveness of disclosure and to encourage companies to apply professional judgement in determining what information to disclose in their financial statements when applying IAS 1.

Competent authorities should carry out appropriate investigations and remain in charge of specific tasks entailing expert knowledge and appropriate administrative discretion, namely the duty to assess the significance of the damage and to determine which restorative measures should be taken.

An entity shall disclose information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made (and changes to those judgements and assumptions) in determining:

Assessing whether the arrangement is jointly controlled by all of its parties or by a group of the parties, or controlled by one of its parties alone, can require judgement.

When a parent determines that it is an investment entity in accordance with paragraph 27 of IFRS 10, the investment entity shall disclose information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made in determining that it is an investment entity.

As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the possible future resolution of the uncertainties increases, those judgements become more subjective and complex, and the potential for a consequential material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities normally increases accordingly.

Determining appropriate classes of assets and liabilities for which disclosures about fair value measurements should be provided requires judgement.

Therefore, if such a scheme is to be justified, it must be based on objective, non-discriminatory criteria known in advance, in such a way as adequately to circumscribe the exercise of the national authorities’ discretion.

However, a scheme of prior administrative authorisation cannot render legitimate discretionary conduct on the part of the national authorities which is liable to negate the effectiveness of provisions of Community law, in particular those relating to a fundamental freedom such as the free movement of capital.

The operator shall implement a non-punitive process for the use of the discretion described under this provision and shall describe it in the operations manual.

The indirect judicial review carried out by the Court in connection with an action for annulment of a Community act adopted, where no discretion whatsoever may be exercised, with a view to putting into effect a resolution of the Security Council may therefore, highly exceptionally, extend to determining whether the superior rules of international law falling within the ambit of jus cogens have been observed, in particular, the mandatory provisions concerning the universal protection of human rights, from which neither the Member States nor the bodies of the United Nations may derogate because they constitute “intransgressible principles of international customary law” (Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 8 July 1996, The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Reports 1996, p.