Übersetzung für "Militärisches engagement" in Englisch

Does this imply a direct European military commitment?

Now its military involvement in the rest of the world has ended.

All too often, responsibility is perceived as meaning military engagement.

Security in Afghanistan required both civilian and military engagement.

Military involvement in Africa is right.

In all countries, the leading enterprises of the sector generally have both civilian and military activities.

The framework for European military engagement is always diplomacy, civilian crisis management and conflict prevention.

The low price of oil could be one reason for Russia's military engagement in Syria, Kaleva speculates:

I am full of admiration for the work of NATO ISAF troops in Afghanistan but regret the lack of participation by some of our allies with restrictive caveats on military engagement, in a situation where defeat, or cutting and running prematurely on the part of NATO, would have incalculable consequences for Western security and for lasting peace in the region - destabilising Pakistan in particular.

This does not necessarily mean military engagement but we have to engage in a more efficient manner and in a more coordinated manner amongst ourselves and with others - the United States, the international community at large, the United Nations.

Poland, for its part, has reflected this gratitude by a willingness to support the US whenever needed, including military engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I believe it comes at a really opportune moment with so much at stake to both our military and our civilian commitments.

NATO is, admittedly, still ready to give the order to go into action, but the credibility of the only western military alliance to remain intact has suffered in Kosovo, not only because of the jealousy which keeps on surfacing between the United States and France, but also, and above all, because of the European partners' hesitation to become involved in a cost-intensive military operation which might last for years.

Similarly, they do not want European Union involvement in military matters, complicating and duplicating Nato and creating additional tensions with our vital transatlantic allies.

Moreover, commencing military action in this region will set the Arab world ablaze, plunge the people into decades of poverty, and send weakened political regimes into the arms of fundamentalism.

It has been said that military involvement will only come when there is an agreement within the government and an agreement with the rebels, and it is with this last point that, in my view, the problem lies.

Indeed, at a time of painful budget cuts – the US is facing a $52 trillion shortfall on public pensions and health care in the coming decades – the US can no longer be expected to maintain its current level of global military engagement.

ISIS hopes that, as the human and economic costs of the fight against ISIS accumulate in those countries, particularly in Europe, public opinion may turn against military involvement in Iraq and Syria.

Only recently, with the increasing US military disengagement, prompted by the ending of the cold war and budget cuts, the North American influence has declined sharply, giving way to Japanese economic strategy, characteristic of post-war Japanese foreign policy.

This year we are expanding our theme from education to all other "public spaces" where we see military engagement to young people.

It will also need a military engagement directly on the ground, and a cost in human lives and material as well as unexpected outcomes.

The Party, the government, and the entire Albanian people forcefully condemn the aggressive policy followed by the United States of America towards Vietnam where it is continuing its military involvement, urging the Saigon administration to violate the Paris Agreements, and inciting it to grave provocations against the Vietnamese people.

On December 9 British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner signed their names to a joint opinion piece which included confirmation of the EU's role in supplementing US and NATO arms and military involvement in the South Caucasus.

These conflicts stand for Western hubris, for the insolubility of some religious and ethnic conflicts,for the danger of a “slippery slope,” in which even a minor, short-term military engagement may end up lasting for years.

Military engagement is always the last resort, it’s to be used only when all other options have been exhausted.

Neither in Ukraine nor in North Africa in particular can we count on others – the US ultimately – providing the necessary stability, be it through political, financial or military engagement.

According to a statement by the Yekîtî, the context to the kidnapping is Qare’s military engagement for the party, which maintains several military battalions with a few dozen fighters each in the Kurdish regions.